欢乐颂

US Supreme Court Limits Use of Anti-Air Pollution Law in Major Blow to WH's Climate Change Policy_我的网站

A |     就在乌克兰独立日来临之际，俄罗斯又给西方划起了所谓的“红线”。    而泽连斯基则罕见地公开批评了费多罗夫，后者正在给乌克兰制造分裂。

B |     The US Supreme Court has ruled that the Environmental Protection Agency interpreted the Clean Air Act - the country's main anti-air pollution law that allows the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions - too broadly, and ordered to limit its use. Six justices deemed "conservative" supported the decision, while three "liberal" justices opposed it.,The court specifically ruled that the EPA does not have the authority to limit emissions from power plants using the Clean Air Act.,The decision comes as a response to an appeal by 19 states, coal companies and power plants to prevent the EPA from abusing broad authority to regulate emissions. They asked the US Supreme Court to allow them greater flexibility in phasing out emissions-intensive plants, namely coal ones so that they could provide services reliably.,The ruling might undermine Joe Biden's planned efforts to propose mandatory emission reductions at power plants in the US by the end of the year. It is supposed to be the first step in the POTUS' broader plan to have the country's power generation emissions-free in 13 years.,So Much for Climate Agenda? Biden Administration Issues More Gas, Oil Drilling Permits Than Trump29 January, 13:17 GMT,The idea of regulating power plant emissions dates back to the Obama administration and its plans to pass the Clean Power Plan that would have explicitly given the government the tools to retire emissions-intensive coal plans. The act was effectively blocked by a 5-4 US Supreme Court decision in 2016 and shelved for good under the Donald Trump administration.,Regardless of the Democrats' efforts, the US power plant emissions have actually already sunk below the levels that should have been achieved only by 2030 under Obama's original plan. They were achieved thanks to closures of the very same coal plants driven by market mechanisms.。

C |         NEXTA新闻报道，当地时间8月24日，俄外长拉夫罗夫对欧洲发出警告，声称参与对俄空袭将被视为“开战”。

D |     早些时候，莫斯科曾指责英国制造的无人机参与了俄乌战争，被用来支援了乌军对俄罗斯的袭击。

E |     拉夫罗夫表示这将是一条“红线”，俄军不排除对援助乌克兰的相关设施发起报复性打击。        从2022年以来，类似的红线俄方已划了无数条，从西方军援的F-16战机到远程导弹，他们都曾威胁会让欧洲陷入战争。    然而显而易见的是，这些红线都已一一被踩过，现在不过是又多了一条，似乎欧洲都见怪不怪了。

F |         与此同时，乌克兰前防长费多罗夫引起的争议还在发酵，他暗指泽连斯基政府贪腐严重，还公开要求在战时选举。

G |     但费多罗夫好像忘了，他从2019年就入驻了泽连斯基政府，他自己并不是局外人。

H | 而战时选举的言论则让其失去了大部分人的支持。    从喊出这句话的那一刻起，声援费多罗夫的抗议民众就消散了，他们知道乌克兰仍处于战争时期。        泽连斯基也直言费多罗夫正在被推向错误的方向，他曾亲自向费提供了四个选项，让对方可以继续在团队中工作，研究他的无人机战略。    但费多罗夫都一一拒绝了，看来他心中的位置并不止防长这么简单，他是想当总统，所以才会冒天下之大不韪要在战时选举。    连乌克兰几个大的反对党，包括泽连斯基的政敌们都不支持战争期间搞大选，因为他们知道这很危险，可能会导致前线崩溃。

I |             8月24是乌克兰的独立日，泽连斯基向过去1643天内支撑大厦不倒的军人们予以致敬，他们才是这个国家真正的英雄。    泽连斯基重申永远不会放弃顿巴斯。返回，查看更多。

Current article:http://4ere19.senbatuqiuzhuanlanrilao.sbs/list_wlxk/nmwmkn.html

Published on:19:55:32